Assemblyman Daniel Benson has introduced legislation that would prohibit hotels from interfering with wireless networking services in light of recent attempts by large hotel chains to block guests from using their own wireless Internet devices.
“By blocking a customer’s access to their own private networks, hotels are attempting to limit consumer choice while making a profit,” said Benson (D-Mercer/Middlesex). “This bill will prevent hotels from claiming ownership over wireless systems that merely pass through their properties.”
Benson noted that the bill was prompted by a Federal Communications Commission (FCC) investigation, which revealed that Marriott International employees had used containment features of a Wi-Fi monitoring system at a conference held in Nashville, Tennessee to prevent individuals from connecting to the Internet via their own personal Wi-Fi networks, while at the same time charging consumers, small businesses, and exhibitors as much as $1,000 per device to access Marriott’s Wi-Fi network. In October, the FCC levied a $600,000 fine against Marriott for the incident.
The bill (A-4115) would ban any person or hotel from operating any device that blocks or otherwise interferes with someone’s ability to establish or access wireless networking services.
“The whole point of technological advances like Wi-Fi is to allow more people to have access to the internet by generating their own hotspots with their own devices. Any action to block free access not only takes advantage of hotel guests but serves to thwart innovation for the sake of profit by forcing consumers to pay an unfair Wi-Fi charge,” added Benson.
The bill would also find guilty parties liable to a civil penalty of up to $500 for the first offense, and up $1000 for the second and each subsequent offense.
The measure was introduced on Jan. 15 and referred to the Assembly Telecommunications and Utilities Committee.
[TLS]
We need “net neutrality” through technological innovation and competition, not government “regulation”!
There is no limit to number of Internet Service Providers you can have, especially with various wireless technologies (including Wi-Fi drones / blimps, satellite Internet, etc). Tests can be done to indicate if each one does any filtering, quality-of-service prioritization of traffic, etc. If users don’t want that, they’ll choose ISPs that are 100% neutral.
Same thing with connection blocking at places like hotels. You get to choose which hotel you stay at (and if Hospitality Services were less regulated you’d have a lot more choices in any given area). You (individually) don’t choose your government. If hotels see that even a small percentage of customers will avoid them or write bad reviews over the connection blocking issue, they would have much to lose if they don’t quit that practice.
There is nothing that government hates more than Internet freedom – kryptonite to its total hegemony over our lives! WikiLeaks! BitTorrent! Bitcoin! Tor!
Trusting the government to “regulate” the Internet is the worst example of naive brainless blind faith! You’d be better off trusting a fox to guard your henhouse, because foxes can be trained and paid with better food. Government power, on the other hand, will ALWAYS act in its own interest, and no one has any leverage to keep it under control.
Putting in a $1000.00 is nothing when they make that many times over when they have large shows. This is another feel good law and and wasy way for the state to make money.