Advertisements

Congressman Smith votes to defend state voter ID laws as Democrats push to federalize elections

Rep. Chris Smith (R-NJ) today voted to defend voter identification laws across the country and uphold states’ election security laws as House Democrats rammed through legislation—HR 5746—to federalize elections and force states to implement measures that would drastically weaken the integrity of the vote.

“The so-called ‘Freedom to Vote Act’ jammed through the House by Democrats seriously jeopardizes our sacred right to vote,” said Rep. Smith.

“This partisan bill weakens our election security and undermines free and fair elections—the very cornerstone of our democracy,” said Smith.

“Under an egregiously false facade of reform, this legislation consolidates and transfers new sweeping powers to federal bureaucrats to regulate elections and nullifies existing state laws requiring valid identification before registering to vote or casting a ballot,” Smith said.

Among its other most egregious provisions, HR 5746:

  • Mandates taxpayer-funded campaigns;
  • Grants the right to vote to convicted felons;
  • Overrules state bans on ballot harvesting; and
  • Requires states to allow same-day voter registration—thus precluding any serious process at the local level to verify the eligibility of the applicant to vote.

“More than two-thirds of states currently rely on these verification laws to protect the vote of law-abiding U.S. citizens,” said Smith. “Prohibiting sensible precautions will make our elections less secure, more vulnerable to fraudulent activity, and undermines participation in our democracy.”

“In order to enter federal buildings or the U.S. Congress, a person has to show a photo ID. If people can’t go to the bank and cash a check—or even put money into a bank account—without an ID, then showing an ID to vote doesn’t seem to be an unusual requirement. We should have that same respect for the integrity of the vote.”

The bill also reinstates and expands Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 that was struck down by the Supreme Court in 2013.

Section 4 had instituted “preclearance” requirements mandating certain states to get the approval of the US Attorney General before they could implement voting laws. In striking down the provision, the Supreme Court noted that the conditions which originally justified such a measure were no longer present.

HR 5746 not only circumvents the high court’s decision but also dramatically expands the list of provisions subject to “preclearance,” giving an unelected Attorney General the ability to undermine certain laws—including voter identification laws.

Last year, Smith strongly opposed and voted against similar legislation—HR 4—which also bypasses the Supreme Court’s decision and grants the federal government more power to override state election laws. Smith also voted “No” on HR 1, which eliminates many state voter protection laws—including by nullifying voter ID requirements, mandating same-day voter registration and expanding vote by mail.

-------------

This content, and any other content on TLS, may not be republished or reproduced without prior permission from TLS. Copying or reproducing our content is both against the law and against Halacha. To inquire about using our content, including videos or photos, email us at general@thelakewoodscoop.com.

Stay up to date with our news alerts by following us on Twitter, Instagram and Facebook.

**Click here to join over 10,000 receiving our Whatsapp Status updates!**

Got a news tip? Email us at newstips@thelakewoodscoop.com, Text 415-857-2667, or WhatsApp 609-661-8668.

Check out TLS's latest Instagram Posts

There are 3 Comments to "Congressman Smith votes to defend state voter ID laws as Democrats push to federalize elections"

  • American Patriot says:

    Republicans realize they have a much better chance of beating the Democrats if they keep as many people as possible from voting.

  • Ed says:

    American patriot, name me one person you know who can’t vote that this bill would help? Right, you can’t. Anyone who wants to vote now, can.
    Facts.
    Convicted felons is a dif point, but that’s not the main focus of this bill.

  • Pineyid says:

    I agree with the congressman vote because the way the Democrats are drafting this bill it is rife with corruption. The one question that I have in general is that why if we can put a man in the moon, we can send a spaceship tomorrow’s, we can make banking transactions in the tens of thousands of dollars why we cannot figure out how to vote securely using our modern day technology so that every legitimate vote can be counted. This is something I believe our government should be looking into and work out a plan that I believe would be satisfactory to all parties involved.